Urbit Market Cap, that is the question i have ideas, but i'm interested in your spatial time:matter
-
Show this thread
-
@urbit is there an update to the 2016 Galaxy Table? https://urbit.org/blog/interim-constitution/ …pic.twitter.com/c4k3HU9eXy
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @urbit
What’s the difference between the 206 Galaxies as of this post and 255 at present?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lwsnbaker
That post must be wrong somehow. There have always been 256 galaxies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @urbit
The numbers are all over the place...Urbit's 2016 post above adds up to 205. This post says 255. A few posts seem to suggest numbers are approximates...a little help? https://medium.com/vandal-press/urbit-and-the-not-so-dark-future-of-the-internet-400c9b667e2 …pic.twitter.com/lysOaAFlSt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @bronzejaguar @urbit
Yea, seemed pretty simple to me which is why the post with varying numbers were throwing me off.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lwsnbaker @bronzejaguar
The galaxies were originally tracked in ames.hoon (you can look at the github archives if you’re curious)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Then, last year, we registered everything in the Azimuth contract, which is also public.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.