1970: One more lane will fix it.
1980: One more lane will fix it.
1990: One more lane will fix it.
2000: One less lane will fix it.
2010: One less lane will fix it.
2019:
pic.twitter.com/CGYL5DD3Q0
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I’ve been told by civil engineers a basic principle is you can’t outbuild congestion - as shown by your video
-
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Most of those folx are one person per car. "But I need my car." Need? Or want?
-
It's not an issue of individual virtue or vice. The way US cities are designed carpooling or public transit is not a viable option for most. It is up to cities to *make* them viable with more affordable housing close to jobs and better public transit, to start.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
My God that's beautiful
-
That is not
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Just remember German mathematician Dietrich Braess - "closing road" could speed up trafficpic.twitter.com/9MDuNbJtFu
-
There's a great video by
@upndatom on Braess's Paradox with a mind-blowing illustrative experiment on equilibria.https://youtu.be/cALezV_Fwi0 - Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Since at least the 1930s (see Robert Moses in NYC) we've seen that adding additional car capacity (new bridges, lanes) tends to *increase* traffic, not abate it. The only way to reduce traffic is to add more public transit that people will be willing to use instead of their cars.
-
We could also build more self sustaining communities where people dont have to commute halfway across a region just to buy something or go to work.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
Cyclists’ Federation