This is a terrible take.
It totally misses the key point: @arxiv_org handles >10k submissions and >25m downloads per month at a cost of only $1.3m /year. @IEEEorg spends $193m (!) on publications, and @TheOfficialACM spends $33.7m.
Something stinks.https://sigchi.org/2020/01/sigchi-open-access/ …
-
-
There is a whole lot of simmering reality in the seemingly banal footnote 3: "arXiv can depend on growth based on increased submissions and downloads annually and must invest in their assets to prepare for the increased financial liabilities of this growth."
-
That statement was true 15 years ago. Look at the budget, look at the staffing, look at the growth. The arXiv staff does miracles with that shoestring. At some point the community will face the fact that miracles don't exist.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.