I would really like to see some work on nominal types/opaque types/newtypes. It's a very useful tool for writing safe app logic. It can be done now with clever branding or this library https://github.com/gcanti/newtype-ts … but it would be great to have it as a native feature for wider adoption
-
-
-
Perhaps using the `unique` keyword since that already exists for symbols. Like: `unique type UserId = string`
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think I'm going to need to find a new repository to help maintain
...but getting rid of the duplicated work & company binding would be nice. @drosenwasser how do you want messaging to happen on TSLint's side? Should there be a discussion? -
I think we'll have to put together a meeting with
@tarquinius623, you, and TSLint's other contributors some time soon just to be in sync on everything. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Please invest more in issues, its 3200+ at this moment. Any advice onthis one will be very helpfulhttps://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/28748#issuecomment-450521401 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
probably never happen but runtime types would be a game changer like https://github.com/gcanti/io-ts
-
Unfortunately not - not part of the language's goalshttps://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Handbook changes sound great!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are y'all hiring?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
