How on earth did he come to the estimation of 1% of the population getting infected?
-
-
-
He gave an exemple...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now it's easier to appreciate the sources of the bias: 1% infected? Why? In the Diamond Princess, 19% of the guests were infected. 0.3% case fatality rate, coming from a Diamond Princess analysis? I think Diamond Princess had 712 cases and 13 deaths (a 1.825 case fatality rate).
-
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00885-w … Cfr 1.1% and ifr 0.5%... coming from nature. Not a bad journal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
John Ioannidis has about as much credibility left as Didier Raoult or Deborah Birx
-
well his latest study certainly had significant problems. It seems like he is very much ideologically into this which is so unlike him. To say it's disappointing as an understatement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Josh are you proposing with this graph that there were only ~3000 more deaths during this period than is typical?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
lmao why the Fuckst was anyone assuming only 1% of the US population would be infected
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.