Conversation

Well the cars come out of the tunnels and go to the stations---also cars themselves have inherent risks of combustion/catastrophic failure, all of which are far greater than trains.
1
1
cars stay in tunnel until service ends. they're next to the parking lot so none of that street specific crashes apply but even if it did, no other passengers are hurt. trains cars don't have catastrophic failure? derailment? again you're ignoring what applies to trains
2
1
what does this have to do with anything? where's your data that pedestrian crosswalks at car station loops have lots of injuries?
1
1
It is obvious if you look at the layout of those stations. You cannot really get to the center collection point without crossing the road. We don't have data on injuries, but I expect them to be fairly comparable to ride sharing in general.
1
"you expect" again lots of guessing and no actual proof. your hate for elon clouds your judgement.
2
1
Let's be clear. It is a small tunnel with a taxi service. That is all. It will be worse than what we already have in public transport in every aspect, except it creates more jobs (although many times more expensive for the user)
1
And letting uber use the tunnels for additional cost. It will just work as a service for those that have more money and want to get somewhere a few minutes quicker. Environmental cost is huge for limited use. Concrete, batteries, cars.
1
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show