Ever share a meme, share a photo that isn’t yours, or download a photo you didn’t create? Under a proposed law, you could easily find yourself owing $5,000 after only the most trivial nod towards due process.https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/life-altering-copyright-lawsuits-could-come-regular-internet-users-under-new-law …
-
-
Replying to @EFF
The CASE Act doesn't create law--it gives small businesses like photographers and illustrators a way to pursue infringements for SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY ILLEGAL. If you block it, the only alternative will remain a federal lawsuit- with damages up to $150,000 per infringement.
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @aliciaphoto @EFF
Only in some cases they will sue even if is fair use. See all the fake
@YouTube copy strikes as a good example1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @tweets_nika @aliciaphoto and
Examples of
@TeamYouTube processing strikes for what you consider fair use?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dxgl_org @aliciaphoto and
Reviews, news reporting... Good exmples: a lady got her video striked for reviewing a product she got on ebay she clearly DID NOT know that the product sold is having the same name as a product still not launched by a company. CD baby claimed a guys own voice he audio tested
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
(how should she as a consumer know? it is not her responsibility to check it)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.