Saying circumcision is genital mutilation is acc the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
Look at FGM for example, it takes away pleasure and serves as a way to discourage premarital sex and to reduce a woman’s libido. Male circumcision does not do the same and isn’t done for the same purposes either. Infact it doesn’t really change the sexual life of the boy.
-
-
Isn’t there 1000s of nerves in your foreskin though? If I have sons I would rather not do that to them tbh. It is definitely different to FGM
-
Comparing the 2 is majorly dramatic. Look at the word “mutilate” male circumcision is really not that
-
"To cut up or alter radically" yup that's circumcision alright. "To cut off or permanently destroy... an essential part of" yup, checks outpic.twitter.com/RdosH6xa50
-
Well well well
-
It’s not the same and I’m really not gonna budge. One’s legal the other one isn’t
Good day gentlemen
-
Neither are we. Good night x
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here's the purpose of circumcision that sold it to America back in the 1800s. Here's science confirming that yes it does destroy sexual sensitivity: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 pic.twitter.com/BAB6lgZcaa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
