Important context to my and @annaschecter’s story regarding a second woman Michael Avenatti put forward to corroborate Julie Swetnick’s claims about Brett Kavanaugh 1/8
-
-
When Senator Grassley cited my interview with Swetnick this week when making a criminal referral, the second woman’s story became newsworthy again, so we published right away. 7/8
Pokaż ten wątek -
We always want to be clear and fully transparent around our reporting, and that’s what we’re doing here. 8/8
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
But...the quote you used was given before his hearing...so, seems like this is a lie.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
You realize this thread is literally an admission of guilt right? Well done
@NBCNews -
She wouldn't get it if it swallowed her whole. She's traded reasoning for a career.pic.twitter.com/owGGsTCj5i
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
"the news value was limited"? The idea that this story wouldn't have been newsworthy in the immediate aftermath of the whole Kavanaugh matter is farfetched. Would a story about someone who supported Kavanaugh's version of events backtracking afterwards been deemed not newsworthy?
-
It would have helped clear his name, which is exactly why she felt it was not “newsworthy. “
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Crock. We don't believe you. You were more interested in supporting your political bias than factual reporting. You knowingly aired a hit piece and deliberately hid facts from your viewers and the committee. You cannot come out of this unscathed.
-
Nailed it.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.