(1/5) I worked for a fair, honest, and transparent process, modeled after the Clinton trial, to provide ample time for both sides to present their cases, ask thoughtful questions, and determine whether we need more.
-
-
Well that's b*******. Trump wouldn't allow witnesses who had first-hand knowledge to testify and those who did testify did so against Trump's will. They are the true Patriots
-
And they still couldn’t make the case b/c he did Nothing impeachable
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
tRump forbade witnesses to appear in the House. Regardless, Bolton was ready & not allowing him to testify is a travesty to justice
-
Naww it wasn’t So sad too bad Not only
@realDonaldTrump used executive privilege but so has@BarackObama@BillClinton#GWB - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hmmmm. In a trial for us normal citizens, the prosecution can call as many witnesses as they want to. Period. That’s it. That’s all. Rules and laws should apply to all U. S. citizens equally.
-
That’s what
@HouseDemocrats did in the basement they were the “prosecutors - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They were invited to have FACT witnesses. They declined.pic.twitter.com/SkIHk25atO
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yes, everyone knows how inconvenient witnesses are to a trial...said no one ever.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
3 of the witnesses in the House were requested by the White House/Republicans. GOP disowning them now since they told the truth instead of covering up the President’s crimes.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
