C’mon, Doc, you know better. State govs own driver reg data. F/ beginning of auto era, they’ve sold data to insurers, auto mfctrs, retailers. Among other things, that cars-on-road and auto lifecycle data has helped track & improve automotive performance
-
-
Replying to @r2rothenberg @dsearls
Let's not distract from the key topic here. We're not indicting DMVs. We are indicting surveillance adtech, your paying members. When user visit http://nytimes.com they know and are ok with http://nytimes.com tracking them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They don't know that 80 other adtech trackers are tracking them and siphoning data elsewhere for profit. No knowledge, no consent, and no recourse is what we are railing against. All are now acts of crime (law finally caught up) committed by your paying members for years.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The fact that it remained hidden for years doesn't make it right. Just like Facebook' Cambridge Analytica scandal. The problem was that consumers didn't know about it and didn't give consent. And they had no recourse even after finding out.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It is surveillance adtech by your paying members that highjacked the internet. It was a balanced 3-legged stool -- advertisers, publishers, real human audiences - previously. The 4th leg - adtech - is what caused the stool to fall. https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/what-surveillance-capitalism-and-how-did-it-hijack-internet …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
WARNING: all readers be aware of the establishment's modus operandi -- 3d's -- deny, distract, and discredit. Cc
@profcarroll@AdContrarian@dmarti@zimbalist@EFF@jason_kint@DCNorg@PrivacyRef2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @acfou @r2rothenberg and
Augustine / Randall: The
#privacy movement is the catalyst for the next iteration of the web: “Not willing to be made known to others” Scope of PI to include "whereabouts” Etc Maybe we should be looking to#China Via@WilmerHale Cc@EvolveLawNowhttps://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20190909-chinas-draft-civil-code-to-extend-privacy-protection …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What do you think
@niubi@shaunrein@KaiserKuo ? I mean, compare this thread to what is covered by the draft Civil Code from the National People’s Congress, and it looks like#China is ahead of the game. Just like in#5G and why America might miss it. N'est-ce pas@scrawford2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think 5G is both inevitable and a possible way for telcos and governments (starting with China) to enclose the open
#Internet. See what I wrote in@LinuxJournal here: http://linuxjournal.com/content/linuxs-broadening-foundation … HT@davidisen@linuxfoundation1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@elenaneira with 5G will it be possible to do away with telco NAT, so we can individually address mobile devices by their IPv6 address?1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
It is independent of 5g. You can have IPv6 already with 2g,3g,4g.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.