Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Big announcement today from @AndrewYang: the Attention Economy is now a 
2020 Presidential Issue, with Yang’s proposal for a federal Department of the Attention Economy 
! Here’s why this matters (1/7) 
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/18/perspectives/andrew-yang-technology/index.html …
2.7 billion people are under technology's psychological influence for hours a day. 
As technology becomes exponentially more powerful, it overwhelms our innate human limits. 
The business model of selling manipulation for profit is increasingly dangerous. (2/7)
This is a global threat and a Presidential-level issue: the attention economy threatens our competitive edge as an economic power , and imperils the very core of our democracy. And it's eroding our sense-making and mental well-being. 
( 3/7)
That’s why I appreciate @AndrewYang’s acknowledgement that we need a modern, ongoing approach to this public health crisis. As long as tech cos continue to profit massively
from the mismatch btwn tech & humans, human downgrading will only worsen and wealth disparity will 
(4/7)
We’re excited to see the “attention economy” and a “Department of the Attention Economy” enter the Presidential debate on the national political stage. @AndrewYang sees the issue at its real scale: a big enough challenge that it deserves its own dept & long-term commitment(5/7)
Time is running out to address the unprecedented global challenges we face. We need technology that helps us face challenges instead of tearing us apart, distracting us, and distorting truth. I hope we hear more on this from @AndrewYang on the debate stage Weds night. (6/7)
I hope policymakers at all levels and from all sides of the political spectrum will pay close attention to these policies and the ideas @AndrewYang is proposing and commit to bringing real reforms to the attention economy. 
(7/7) https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/18/perspectives/andrew-yang-technology/index.html …
This issue seems important but one area I'll have to disagree with Yang on. Regulating specific features and functionality seems unnecessarily prohibitive. Would prefer to see more widespread awareness into giving people the self-control and redirection skills necessary to fix
App algorithms are literally developed by geniuses specifically to act as dopamine release buttons. Investing in self control is a losing battle when these apps are designed to target very primitive parts of our reward system.
As a working father with a working spouse, I would welcome any help we could get with this issue. Yang is right. We don't stand a chance against these companies without intervention.
Haha wild I nearly tagged you in this but I figured I would just text you about it instead. Perfect example of what I meant re Yang.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
