The SpaceX Falcon 9 ride-share "included 48 Earth imaging satellites dubbed SuperDoves from Planet, 17 tiny communications satellites for Toronto-based Kepler, and 30 small satellites for the US and Europe packaged by Berlin, Germany-based Exolaunch."https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEJJLwWTG7RLFCAN7xKbIqt4qFggEKg4IACoGCAow3O8nMMqOBjD38Ak?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen …
-
-
Show this thread
-
These Starlinks are the first launched into a polar orbit enabling coverage further north, including in polar regions. Delivered to Sun-synchronous orbit of 550 km inclined 97.59 degrees to the equator. Polar orbit missions typically go from Vandenberg, but this one was Florida.
Show this thread -
4/ The maneuver that the Falcon 9 pulls off to land is still cray. Note that the need for fuel to land means there's less payload going up but with 3 or more launches of the same reusable parts, the economics are better says Musk. Small payloads cost more per kilogram (eg $15k).pic.twitter.com/TjS5Ulsrm9
Show this thread -
5/ A satellite must be able to talk to a gateway in Earth to enable real time communication. Over the polar regions gateways are hard to build so inter-satellite links enable a daisy chain to a gateway. These aren't laser links to ground terminals, but instead between satellites.pic.twitter.com/E6o3qiPEAN
Show this thread -
6/ The Starlink gateway in Alaska was confirmation some satellites would be in polar orbit. The shortest path to ground based fiber is usually to get polar traffic to that gateway via inter satellite links. Each link creates incremental latency due to on board processing.pic.twitter.com/ip1gMvycdV
Show this thread -
7/ Why not put optical inter-satellite links (OISLs) on the non polar orbit constellation? Its cheaper to leave them off, creates less failure risk and conserves power to use a ground gateway. Will ocean coverage make OISls valuable at some point? Sure. https://www.spaceintelreport.com/spacex-starlink-inter-satellite-links-useful-not-essential-regulatory-deployment-deadlines-not-a-problem/ …pic.twitter.com/NzpRYCX2wL
Show this thread -
8/ If a particular inter-satellite link fails there is the option of the Alaska gateway or to build more polar gateways. By putting those 10 satellites in that new polar obit at that altitude SpaceX/Starlink has "licked the cookie." They now "have dibs" on the altitude/orbit.
Show this thread -
9/ Here's confirmation of my thesis. I win a participation trophy.pic.twitter.com/jnYKkf88ec
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I saw this video last week which talked about the latencies of global fiber vs satellite lasers. Because of the vacuum in space the lasers are faster than fiber.https://youtu.be/m05abdGSOxY
-
Signals travel about 31% slower in fiber optic networks than in free space. But both have distance and processing delays. Doing a ping on Iridium is about 450ms. Every node has a process delay. Fiber has vastly more bandwidth but isn't mobile. Everything is a tradeoff.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.