the frog's creator has a (legal and imho moral) right to defend his intellectual property, even tho it's permanently damaged. "incel," well… I don't think it should be reclaimed because it shouldn't've been claimed/coined.
the idea underpinning "incel," basically, is that people are owed sex, like sex is a right and not a privilege.* that's not cool. *in a social sense. obviously, governments should not be making laws about consenting adults' sexual activity.