Israel might be a bit miscalculating to rely too much on American support.
Even NYT admits towards end of the article that Israel initiated the exchange of fire: "The barrage came after an apparent Israeli missile strike against a village in the Syrian Golan Heights late Wednesday." So why isn't this the lead or headline???https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/world/middleeast/israel-iran-syria-military.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that what the title says?
-
The title says they struck, not that they struck first. Our own administration is saying that Israel is defending themselves, which is false when they're the aggressors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
C'mon, you know why? The non-English speaking Korean Americans release is more important. Besides, why cover Israel's occupying and bombing of a sovereign country's land and citizens?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@IKershner Care to comment on this? -
Because the rocket barrage/Quds Force retaliation had apparently been planned for some time. Iran vowed a month ago to avenge the April 9 attack on T4. This is more about that, not the apparent Israeli strike on Wednesday night. Seems each side simply waited for an opportunity...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The New York Times is Fake News!
-
Probeer toch enig niveau te behouden, meneerke. Zeker tgo serieuze mensen (waartoe ik mezelf niet reken).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.