This is because religion is not a private belief; it is a nested set of practices, some of which must be carried out in the public sphere. To restrain religion to the “private” sphere is synonymous with its destruction (or displacement by another faith).
“Secular humanism” claims not to be against religious institutions. But, in practice, secular humanism is never a neutral instrument; it must pull apart the majority religion & so it is de facto destructive of religion, only allowing itself as a belief.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.