My recollection is that Curtis implied that the sectaries didn't behave in the way the model predicted they would and this disproved the model, or rather implied that the GT model was the product of an autistic, paranoid intelligence.
I still think, given the ideological thrust of the film, that this event was read in a particular way. But, of course, we can’t say for sure if this was a misrepresentation or misreading. I have my hunch.https://twitter.com/parallaxoptics/status/983471075169394688 …
-
-
-
But in fact, as I already stated, the sectaries were just playing a "larger" game in which it was more important for them not to act / be perceived as "selfish" than to win in the context of a "small" game thought experiment, their performance in which had less utility to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.