An under appreciated fact about women who have abortions is that they are actually sexually repressed (usually due to being middle class)—even the attractive ones. Here’s to the teenage single mothers, they tend to have some life in them!
-
-
Replying to @tomxhart
Some degree of sexual repression is good. The project to undo sexual repression is the perpetual sexual revolution
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @0x49fa98
1. This was Freud’s point: civilisation requires sexual repression. We then take various drugs to deal with the necessary repression. I think there’s an unhealthy Puritan repression that is simultaneously flagrant and sexless. This is what happens with girls who have abortions.
2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
0% sexual repression is litterally gay.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @0x49fa98
Yes, but Puritan sexual repression is bad, I think. The problem with the abortion-keen is that it’s Puritan or leftist repression. There’s something miserable about it. Perhaps I really mean that sex should always carry procreative potential, it shouldn’t be careful. Be risky.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Norman Mailer: “There is nothing safe about sex. There never will be.” & “Good fucks make good babies.” The leftist Puritans of sex want there to be a lot of “safe” non-procreative, “rational” sex. Incorrect repression.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Although it's worth mentioning that most abortions happen among the working class, although the middle class will have the highest rate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Middle class are too “safe” to make that mistake—planning even more rationally, with condoms. I wonder if the middle classes lie about abortions more in surveys tho...being middle class means being trained in lying.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.