Some degree of sexual repression is good. The project to undo sexual repression is the perpetual sexual revolution
-
-
-
1. This was Freud’s point: civilisation requires sexual repression. We then take various drugs to deal with the necessary repression. I think there’s an unhealthy Puritan repression that is simultaneously flagrant and sexless. This is what happens with girls who have abortions.
-
2. It’s typical of feminists & “liberated” women, the type who have abortions. They have a lot of sex (“sex positive”) but it’s somehow it’s dead or joyless sex—as w/ Vegas, pleasure without joy. They claim not to be repressed, but they are in the sense that it’s non-procreative.
-
3. The single mother type is “not repressed” in the “wrong way”, according to contemporary society, because she uses sex to, say, have a child at 17 (which is “wrong”, she should have had years of joyless sex, according to the narrative). She is more natural, less repressed.
-
Discouraging 17 yos from getting married is the principal failure. Discouraging 17 yos from making babbies is secondary. Woke: Making marriage easy as possible for 17 yos.
-
"Safe sex" is fundamentally repressed. A Puritan coup: do whatever you want, so long as it's masturbatory. Trads are the real pro-sex. Antinomians are the ones with "hang-ups".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mind reeling now!

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.