2. They are, as you observe, fiercely loyal to and motivated by their comrades, rather than abstract ideology. This is because the small team is the most natural state for a man in evolutionary terms. A natural leader will emerge in any such group.
Yes. This is evident in the idea of a just revolt against a tyrannous king. The revolt, as opposed to revolution, seeks to restore the natural order broken by a corrupted king, but not to instantiate a utopian political order in the place of monarchy.
-
-
And your complaint is against "utopian political orders" on the basis that they are not "bounded by nature and reality", and you consider contemporary liberalism to be/to be aiming towards such an unbounded utopian order?
-
Yes. What we’re dealing with is really a degraded liberalism—most of the values of classical liberalism, quite elitist, have been discarded. That’s why I call it technocratic liberalism, the language of rights is used as an ideology by a technocratic corporate-state hybrid.
-
The reason the French Revolution, the English Civil War, the Bolshevik Revolution, and so on were so violent was that these were revolts against reality—usually leading to bizarre and fanatical pseudo-religious social policies, mass persecutions, and famines.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.