Extremely good.https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1040397628196843520 …
I tend to think that the creator/creation division adds an unnecessary level of complication. Why suppose something more than what is?
-
-
One of the reasons for the doctrine is the gratuity of the act of creation. God is not under any necessity; therefore His choice to create is free—and He is thus consistent with His loving nature. If creation is not a free act, it isn’t an act of love.
-
That is a sound reason, but it doesn’t address why one should posit something more than my quote’s interrelation of energy. My dilemma is this: is there such a thing as metaphysics or not? I have not made up my mind, sometimes I think metaphysics is a mental error—sometimes not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.