And it's not for control, you cannot control women, society is geared to prevent that even if you could Instead, it's to provide abundance. She can act a damned fool, and you can easily replace her with someone more valuable. It's about commanding value from the world, nt control
-
-
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
Every skill is awkward, disingenuous, and ineffective. this is why practice exists.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone
1. It’s absolutely about control, because it’s about manipulating another person—as far as possible—to do what you want. As with any manipulation, whether propaganda or law, control can never be complete w/ another human.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart @_Rian_Stone
2. I agree it’s a skill that can be improved, but what I’m sceptical about is that a personality change can occur. This seems to fly in the face of my own observations & what I’ve read of psychology. It means you’ll often have a false front on, effectively working at home.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart
You're different now than you were as a child. Adults change after trauma (your psych research said that too) Why do you think guys only redpill after a girl crushes them? Unless the guy is self sabotaging, it will change him. Rp concepts are great because it gives beneficial
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
Direction to the change. Otherwise, a cheating whore wife could drive a man to suicide, to substance abuse, or other self destructive habits. Instead, it gives a safety net. Some Evo psych understanding of what happened and why, along with positive directions for masculinity
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
The guys who front (and there are many, I'm sure you know the names as well as I do) can't keep it up, can't develop new ideas, and eventually purple pill, like Neil strass or mark Manson.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
It's weird, man needs to develop narcissism to thrive, but without an ego getting in his way. Hard to give that nuance credit in a tweet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone
I don’t agree, narcissism is a pathology. Narcissists don’t have an ego, that’s their problem. Narcissism is counter-thriving, and if it’s required in an environment then that environment is pathological. However, I agree that “faking it till you make it” helps acquiring skills.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomxhart
Narcissist personality disorder is. But it's overloaded. Narcissism is one of the mechanisms that men can overcome neuroticism. When you put yourself at the center of the scale, you never worry if you're interested measure up. Narcissism is just about being the focal point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What you mean by narcissism is egocentrism. But people use narcissism to mean egocentrism in ordinary conversation, hence confusion. Narcissists are empty inside, all they have is an act to preserve. An egotist just thinks he’s the dog’s bollocks; he has a sense of self (Trump).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.