The red pill approach that tells us to use game & continue to use game into marriage seems like a recipe for misery to me. I don’t want to spend 30 yrs using techniques to put a woman under control. Yrs of acting against your nature; it would be like being at work but at home.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @tomxhart
Ask not for a lighter load, but for broader shoulders. As long as you think running game is a discrete task, or an act, yes, it will seem like futility. What you're doing is making attractive behaviour your natural way of being. thats why it's called 'hard mode'
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
And it's not for control, you cannot control women, society is geared to prevent that even if you could Instead, it's to provide abundance. She can act a damned fool, and you can easily replace her with someone more valuable. It's about commanding value from the world, nt control
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone @tomxhart
Every skill is awkward, disingenuous, and ineffective. this is why practice exists.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_Rian_Stone
1. It’s absolutely about control, because it’s about manipulating another person—as far as possible—to do what you want. As with any manipulation, whether propaganda or law, control can never be complete w/ another human.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.