2. Since the aristos bowed out, we’ve made some impressive & possibly sublime things. But we can’t do beauty. We can do maintenance through middle class orgs like the National Trust, but as the middle class decays it’s possible we’ll see conservation deliquesce to destruction.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3. It’s plausible that we’ll see iconoclasm set in within the next 50 years as society polarises between a tiny wealthy elite and a enormous, underemployed working class. I could imagine art & country houses being destroyed as “white supremacist”.
Show this thread -
4. A growing Muslim population will also make overt symbols of the country’s Christian legacy controversial and provocative. It’s quite likely they’ll be effaced. Statues of Victoria etc will almost certainly be removed in the next 30yrs due to imperial legacy.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s the thing, though—I realise the middle class concerns itself with acquisition & consumption, rather than artistic endeavour. But you’d assume they’d at least like & thus create demand for beauty? When/how were taught to be utterly indifferent to it?
-
Beauty requires leisure. The most beauty-orientated societies were in Ancient Greece where it was a morality. The Greek aristocracy despised labor. The middle class and Protestants make a religion of labor. Consequently, they hate beauty & are iconoclasts. That’s why US is ugly.
-
Hmm, very interesting. A hidden corollary to Weber? Yes, it does strike me that despite their ever-increasing incomes and wealth, the Anglo-American middle classes appear more over-stressed and overworked than ever. Among all ‘cures’ suggested to them, you never see ‘work less’.
-
The Anglo-American middle classes are being eaten, relatively speaking. They’re sinking. But, yes, you “work” on your relationship, “workout”, “work” with your children etc. Not working is a sin. It’s literally considered immoral. Unemployment worse than adultery.
-
So if this hypothesis holds, Protestantism should vary inversely with æsthetics... which it seems to, for the most part! At the risk of sounding somewhat Moldbuggian, it is sad to observe in the liberalisation of the Mediterranean & elsewhere a kind of hidden Protestantisation.
-
Iconoclastic & joyless. Protestantism has occasionally been stabilised & made to work productively, but it is generally an entropic force. Who cares what it sounds like, if it sounds like Marx or Moldbug or Genghis Khan—I’m only interested if it’s true. Is the Med liberalising?
-
By liberalising, I mean accepting modern liberal ideology, with all of its nostrums and shibboleths—which tends to be an elite phenomenon at this point, but not quite as ubiquitous in Anglo-America. Ditto for the Balkans & E Europe, where it’s aggressively pushed by a small elite
-
I think Catholicism (Orthodoxy/Islam in Balkans) runs deep in these countries, and there’s a language barrier. I also think that it’s in the blood and national temperament to an extent, not to mention climate—siestas are anti-Protestant. If the US Empire goes pop it’ll recede.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.