1. Basic situation as I see it is this, God got it in the neck for the following reasons: a. Kant reduced demonstrations for his existence to a shakey moral inference. b. Philologists shredded the Bible so the text became unstable c. Voltaire & co mocked the inconsistencies.
-
-
I suggest that only by having an ideal to follow that you achieve anything. Marxism isn’t dead; it’s alive under new names, and it shapes the pop cultural life of the West. It’s an eternal force: entropy. It just changes guises. Marxism died bc Marxism is anti-life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, perhaps there is an important distinction to be made between being eaten up by your ideal and failing to live up to your ideal. The latter can nevertheless be damaging, perhaps fatally, if the ideal is incoherent.
-
I increasingly doubt that there’s anything coherent to be found in man. But I’m a very irrational and intuitive person, not systematic or analytical at all. Truth seems to be paradoxical to me, perhaps making it inherently incoherent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.