1. Notes on prostitution: There will always be prostitutes and prostitution. It is futile to aim at its abolition or any such utopian scheme—and no rightist should indulge in this habit. Note well, it was the French Communists who helped end legal prostitution in France.
-
Show this thread
-
2. It is, obviously, a Puritan preoccupation to root out fucking or whoring. This makes it a leftist obsession. However, it is equally leftist to seek to turn sex, love, and fucking into a product: “the sex worker”.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
3. The goal of legalising prostitution is not to increase joy, as they suggest. It is to reduce everything in human affairs to a completely utilitarian and claculative proposition without any joy, individuality, or beauty. They are obsessed with making whoring “safe”.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
4. What is never discussed in contemporary debates on prostitution is the pimp. The discussion is always about the client or the whore. This runs through academia, the media etc. The pimps are never mentioned.
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
5. Why? It’s because the pimps segue into legitimate business. They pay off the police and local officials to runt heir brothels. They also bankroll research and media to make their businesses legal and profitable.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @tomxhart
Simply, the sign on the door changes from “massage palour” to “whorehouse”.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
“A rose by any other name...”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.