The slippery slope here is that as the MSM periodically sensationalizes trans-kids (i,e, prepubescent children who enjoy gendered cosplaying), they may soon start to give voice to children who consent to sex with adults.
-
-
Replying to @jbthazard
But is it planned? There were confidential networks that changed how we view homosexuality. There are probably political equivalents for paedophiles that are totally clandestine. Intellectuals on the left were supportive in the 1970s, e.g. Allen Ginsberg
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart @jbthazard
See also: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659100/Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromey-Patricia-Hewitt-and-the-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html … The sexual revolution was always sympathetic to this kind of thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart
I can't speak to how planned or deliberate it is, and I am aware of various organizations worldwide who advocated for its normalization. All I can say is that I hope I speak for the majority of people in saying that sex is meant for adults, at the very least post-pubescent ppl
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jbthazard
1. It is planned. As stated in my original tweet, it’s a lot more common than people think. Paedophiles, like any other group, organise to advance their interests. Look at the RC Church, social services etc & the networks in those groups. These people are often v.intelligent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart @jbthazard
2. What you say is true. Most people are disgusted by it, but they would have said the same about homosexuality up to about 1968. First it was treated as an illness to be pitied, then it was removed from the psych books, and now it’s celebrated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomxhart @jbthazard
3. People have seen what happened with homosexuality and they think, “Why not us?”. Plus, the sexual revolution was a lot more wild than people think if you read about the 1960s/1970s—it’s just we can’t imagine how wild our parents were.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tomxhart
Very intelligent people are often pathologically ideological. Many otherwise smart people I know are your typical SocJus types when you get them started on certain political subject matter
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jbthazard
1. That’s because the more intelligent you are the better you become at lying and self deceiving to keep up appearances. This is what the middle class status games around “being educated” and social justice are about. It’s why the “autistic” & blue collar people get frustrated.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tomxhart
Agreed. All I'm saying is that "very intelligent" people are still susceptible to moral hiccups and miscellaneous psychological "disorders". As you imply, even psychopaths and pathological liars are often quite clever
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course. But I don’t think intelligence is virtue. Our society confuses the two. My point was that intelligent paedophiles see what happened with homosexuality & make plans to advance their cause. The stupid ones get caught so we have a false pic of their capabilities.
-
-
Replying to @tomxhart
Now I see what you're saying, this is a good point
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.