Further to my long thread the other day, an article on the territory shared by the Dark Enlightenment and the Dark Mountain Project: @darkmtn, @underscrutiny, @DrSmithTGeo, @csmaje.
“We are living in a period before a great thunderstorm.”https://medium.com/@TXHart/ideological-analysis-dark-enlightenment-on-a-dark-mountain-48e92bc2b3c5 …
The left is anti-nature. It’s predicated on the idea that the cycle of nature can be transcended, usually through technology (Marx adored the Prometheus myth). This includes transcending death itself (see transhumanism and Soviet views on immortality).
-
-
To me, statements like "the left is anti-nature" or "not believing in progress is rightist" suggest a degree of dogmatism and historical/theoretical naivety that put an end to worthwhile exchange.
-
1/2 I'm afraid I agree. Your imperiousness overshadows whatever might be interesting in your enquiry: who'd of thought a commitment to poetry was a defining element of rightist thought! Imagine trying to explain that to Pablo Neruda!!
-
Neruda didn’t write poetry. He was an ideologue, not an artist. People say they like Neruda to advertise that they are politically correct in the same way they say they like Maya Angelou to “prove” they’re not racist. Neruda worshipped the monster Stalin. Word poison.
-
Enough for me. This doesn't lead anywhere. Go well.
-
Okay, it was interesting. Take care.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.