Further to my long thread the other day, an article on the territory shared by the Dark Enlightenment and the Dark Mountain Project: @darkmtn, @underscrutiny, @DrSmithTGeo, @csmaje.
“We are living in a period before a great thunderstorm.”https://medium.com/@TXHart/ideological-analysis-dark-enlightenment-on-a-dark-mountain-48e92bc2b3c5 …
I didn’t say it was a good thing. I said that’s what a certain type of rightist wants, and that’s what’s happening in China. If the tech advances to detect, say, a sexual interest in children from a person’s face (facial features map to this) then I don’t see what will stop it.
-
-
Please read the article. In the case of facial recognition, you're fundamentally misunderstanding the efficacy of a very questionable tech. Anyway, feel free to DM if you want a more extended discussion. Twitter isn't the forum for expressing anything in depth
-
I don’t follow anyone, so I can’t DM you. The article, once the insinuations of racism and other attempted journo smears are stripped out, merely says that the tech is better than humans but not 100% reliable, i.e. it’s a question of refinement. Not if, but when.
-
You can DM me, tho.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.