1. Heidegger, M (1927) Being and Time: What Aristotle and Plato said about “Being” has become a dogma. It is assumed, and it is considered an empty subject. But we cannot examine ontology without consider “Being”.
2. Being is always assumed, but it is rarely defined. Being transcend the universality of any genus. Despite being the most universal, Being is the subject upon which we are most unclear. Being cannot be conceived of as an entity, since it is universal.
-
-
3. We take it as implicit that “The sky IS blue” etc. But this is an enigma. Being is assumed as being there without elaborating upon it. Being is in the dark. Our first step in investigating this assumed quality is to find the correct way to formulate an investigation.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.