1. Moore & Gillette (1991) “King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine”: This is a superior self-help book (I quite like self-help books). But it suffers from a generational misreading of Jung.
9. Especially to turn them into “Human Resources”. He may have acknowledged the predominance of certain traits, but the goal would be to work these traits together into a whole. But Myers-Briggs is anti-holistic. It encourages people to think of themselves as a label, “I’m INTP!”
-
-
10. I’m an INFJ, according to this schema. But really the goal should be to bring all these elements together.
Show this thread -
11. In fairness to Myers-Briggs, their schema does describe how a person can bring together their different psychological functions into a whole in their lifetime. But it effectively functions as a tool for companies and individuals to pigeonhole themselves, becoming static.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.