"To do" is a pro-verb for actions. Its prominence might be tracked to a need to abstract away from different action-types. This leads to some confusion imo, e.g. in phil of action where, basically, all types of action are taken as subsets of "doing", which is wrong way around.
Expand. Why is it there? A sort of tradition or appendix of language?https://twitter.com/nowhenow/status/1015691808440020994 …
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.