The most distasteful element of the “red pill on women” is their crass materialism. It’s the used car salesman’s approach to life. “What if my wife took my house and ‘divorce raped’ me etc.” Oh no, you wouldn’t be able to buy your toys? Your Xbox or whatever...
-
-
J. Peterson and the red pillers tend towards an idea of stability, as if there was an ideal society we need to hold onto. But perhaps we just need to maintain the rules and change the society. Even in “moral” Victorian times powerful men had many mistresses & bastards.
Show this thread -
You see in the resistance to Robin Hanson’s idea of “redistributing sex” the complications. Women hate it (being forced to have sex with low status men). High status men don’t care. This is based on ressentiment, not healthy.
Show this thread -
The solution to the sexual reserve generated by “incels” and low status men was typically war. Perhaps we just need to channel this energy outwards, alternatively we channel it inwards...revolution...but that would be based on ressentiment. Very ugly.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure it could be called a sexual free marketplace when moderns are quite insulated from the consequences of their decisions within it.
-
exactly
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.