2/ He has integrity, humility and courage. He is also, unlike most “intellectuals”, in this era actually intelligent, competent, and honest with his material. He does actual practice what he preaches. He’s dynamic, and I think reacts to criticism & revises his position.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ He would benefit from leaning more on Jung and Solzhenitsyn and less on classical liberalism, because these are defensible positions against the left. Classical liberalism is not. But he is Anglo, and so liberalism is in his bones (it’s my bones, too). He may not do.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.