I’m more sympathetic, in a way, to the “postmodernists” and transgendered people than Peterson, because they are consistent. He interprets Nietzsche as pointing to the “danger” of everything collapsing. Was he? Was he saying we need to go through?
-
-
If anything Nietzsche was about embracing danger, I would say. At least the transgendered and the “postmodernists” are using technology and trying to do something new with the possibilities & the “danger”—even if it’s a bit bonkers.
Show this thread -
Further, Peterson tries to defend a family form that is dead for a reason. There are 7bn people on Earth. We’re stripped down by the system into atomistic consumers who don’t reproduce and are interchangeable ‘cause it’s efficient. Just import more people.
Show this thread -
Have your marriage (it’s an industry), and have your divorce (it’s an industry). Have your gende-reassignment (it’s a new market for the bored mid-50s male). As long as there’s enough people to grind through the system it doesn’t matter.
Show this thread -
Peterson is trying to rescue the last man with the bourgeois family of the mid-20th century, which doesn’t serve contemporary economic needs. In a way, he’s the “virtual dad” another ersatz experience in nostalgia, just like retro clothes and whatever.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.