3/ But is a group where you confess to other people are good device to remove shame? Actually, it creates the conditions, in my view, where shame is nursed and cultivated. This is why addicts seem strangely proud of being addicts, and never getting better.
-
-
14/ Self describes the villain’s approach as existential. A bit like a Jean-Paul Belmondo film. “Read that smoking is linked to cancer. [Spit ciggie out] Stop smoking. Move forward. Do the job.” Assess what is good for your body, cut out the bad. No moralising. No question.
Show this thread -
15/ This is also the Dr Johnson approach, which holds that giving up completely is easier than moderation. “I’m not doing that any more.” People sometimes describe epiphanies likes this when they feel they’ve smoked every cigarette they had to smoke. They had 10k in them.
Show this thread -
16/ Anyway, the Nietzsche-Johnson approach is the opposite of cultivating a moralised identity as an “addict” where you secretly get off on the shame-confession dynamic of falling off the wagon. You dirty little Puritans.
Show this thread -
17/ But it’s also possible that, really, people need their vices & that the vices are in them. “Self-improvement” is a very American* democratic notion. The other vaguely Nietzschean angle is to accept people need these things to be what they are, even if the results are fatal.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.