Tacit knowledge > abstraction; the bridgebuilder has the former in spades via direct experience with his trade. And so in many ways is much closer to grasping the "nature of bridges"… whereas a philosopher is apt to verbalize about it from afar despite having never crossed one.
The only person mad enough to ask about “bridges” (strictly “bridging”) in general is a philosopher, starting with Socrates. The bridge builder relies on something prior, as per Heidegger. Reasoning about “bridges” in general may be a wrong turn altogether (H’degger again).https://twitter.com/mfckr_/status/1001795772063600641 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.