To make sure I understand what you’re saying, is this a fair summary?: Chomsky’s position is just looking at what something appears to do and reducing it to that, but there is a deeper essence to things not evident in observed behaviour. AI lacks the deeper causal essence.https://twitter.com/mfckr_/status/1001776313324179457 …
@mfckr_ How do we establish the existence of a deeper causal essence? I can only think about self-reflection on human experience, but this seems to me to produce a record of subjective experiences that are not necessarily generalisable to other minds.
-
-
We're converging towards ways of measuring that, mapping out the neuroanatomical morphology underpinning subjective experience, and so on. Much of which is actually suggestive of high intersubjective generalizability… I can link some articles later once I find them again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.