1/ Tommy Robinson, a fool. Robinson represents the typical English attitude— “Oi, mayt, are you lookin’ at me bird?”—writ large into a political ideology. The man actually wants to “save” women. In other words, he’s letting women start a fight between men.
3/ He, like many members of the “alt lite” & neoconservatism, merely wishes to defend the world feminism made—a world of unleashed female sexuality. As it turns out, unleashed female sexuality is p!rnographic and meretricious.
-
-
4/ Men from societies that are not WEIRD quite reasonably view Englishwomen as akin to prostitutes—even other W. Europeans have a low view of Anglo women. Minicab drivers in England are often Muslim. They are exposed to the drunkness, racial abuse, & flagrant sexuality of girls.
Show this thread -
5/ Men from non-WEIRD societies draw the conclusion that men have drawn throughout history. These women are allowed to do this by their men. Therefore, this is what the men are happy with. It follows that these women are open and available for whatever. They act accordingly.
Show this thread -
Tweet unavailable
-
7/ Ultimately, Robinson and Hopkins are liberalism & feminism in self-defence mode. This exposes the connection between liberalism & nationalism. The solution to this problem is simple: constrain and discipline the sexuality of Englishwomen, as was the historical norm.
Show this thread -
8/ It is probable that feminism and liberalism are suicidal: abortion, contraception, late marriage, divorce, suicide (due to abortion & divorce), & multiple sex partners basically kill people. The wages of sin is death. It always was. This behaviour may die out on its own.
Show this thread -
9/ The English could be replaced by a burgeoning Muslim population who adhere more closely to the rules of God. Alternatively, the technocratic state may sabotage the Muslim family. There are indications in mass advertising that Muslim women are marked for “liberation”.
Show this thread -
10/ Time will tell. People from non-WEIRD societies & Muslims may resist the propagandisation more effectively than post-Christians. Postscript: Hopkins and Robinson are not “right wing extremists”. They are liberal and feminist extremists.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.