So journalists believe journalism is more important than free speech? Or journalists feel free speech they disagree with (ie used against them) is weaponized while their free speech is not?
The New Yorker's @SteveCollNY suggests Mark Zuckerberg's "profound" support of free speech is problematic: "Those of us in journalism have to come to terms with the fact that free speech, a principle that we hold sacred, is being weaponized against the principles of journalism."pic.twitter.com/JK3c5tnLou
Steve Coll Suggests Journalists Should Reconsider Value of Free Speech
-
-
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I think he is referring to the use of
#FirstAmendment arguments in court by corporations and politicians to defend their use of "alternative facts." There are no such thing. -
Who decides what the facts are??? The same journos
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Where were these "principles of journalism" when the entire MSM complex committed seppuku this past year?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Something tells me the crackdown on free speech won’t involve holding anyone accountable for the Russiagate hysteria they stirred up for political and financial gain
-
An awful lot of people on the Trump campaign went to prison or needed pardons because of that "hysteria"
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@SteveCollNY I’m calling BS on this. Thanks@tomselliottKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If our press did it’s job in a fair & equitable manner, there wouldn’t be a problem.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.