Yes you do.
-
-
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
i think "escaped from a lab" and "was engineered in a lab" and "was deliberately engineered and let loose from a lab" all kinda got mixed up
-
"As many have pointed out, there is no evidence that the virus now plaguing the world was engineered; scientists largely agree it came from animals. But that is not the same as saying it didn’t come from the lab, which spent years testing bat coronaviruses in animals."
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
.
@TPCarney had a good riff on thisDanke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
I'd say partly because one of the earliest proponents of the theory was Tom Cotton, who also suggested that it could have been a biological weapon or deliberately released
-
also because it seems very unlikely scientists would be working on a novel coronavirus and publish absolutely nothing about it, and not even talk to other scientists outside china
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
I think it got stirred in with the “designed in a lab” crazies.
-
Yeah. Researcher got bitten, not implausible. Genetically-engineered weapon? WTH? Makes no sense and high bar for evidence and also what a stupid weapon (can't aim!) and also doesn't fit what we know.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Scientists who looked at the virus said it’s not possible. https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-not-human-made-in-lab.html …
-
This itself is an example of the bad coverage IMO. The article's substance is clearly about the virus not being engineered by scientists, but the headline claims it's about it escaping from a lab, which are two entirely different things.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.