You’ve badly misread that article - it said most young people did not recognise a politician from the 60s, and included nothing about their views on immigration, simply asked do they know about a speech from 5 decades ago. Unsurprisingly, you had to be there...
I don’t know much about the ‘68 act, but while it’s content may be unobjectionable but you have to admit a lot of what followed is ridiculous - all minority / women shortlists, the idea that all inequalities of outcome are due to conspiracy theories etc
-
-
I was a strong opponent of all-bme shortlists https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2008/03/minority-shortlists-british … I support the race relations act & the new disparity audit. It seems odd & v evasive that GI can not say whether you would keep or repeal the race relations act. The logic of your ideas is surely to repeal?
-
I have never read the ‘68 act, if it is simply about legal restrictions on access to services as it seems then I support it
-
Enoch objected in principle to the state removing the liberty of an Englishman to discriminate (customers, employees, tenants) for any reasons of his own choice, such as a personal preference to have no inter-ethnic colleagues/contact in his business.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.