Au contraire. Indifference to the ballot box seems a perfectly rational *tactic* given that a very mutual indifference towards you. The idea that you would shun the ballot box for reasons of "strategy" if your ideas were as popular as you try to spin seems rather risible.
-
-
I didn't know. Why not? You have to remember like most people, I have heard almost zip about you. Am aware of a bit of pissing around on boats in the Med with pan-European racists & noelw this curious idea that hipster racism is somehow less toxic; not more annoying.
-
Apologies, we don’t think it’s an important issue; unlike mass immigration that’s been going on forever!
-
You contradict yourself. You were noting the social shift was in the last 3 decades & was "unthinkable" in 1960 a few minutes ago. Its a more recent & more rapid shift than race. Still, good to see the retreat from your group's recent intellectual antecedents
-
Who do you think our antecedents are?
-
You tell me who your intellectual antecedents are. Your Sunday Times arguments owe much to Powellism; the attempt to scrub up with a new look seems to me reminiscent of Jorg Haider
-
As much as I agree with you that GI is a bunch of neo-fascist losers with no balls to stand up to electorial scrutiny I must say that they are very successful in influencing some circles around the
@spectator. Aided by what I can only assume to be Russia & Hungary's@Fideszmpsz
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.