So between the lines, only victims of “social inequalities” have free speech, and everyone else should have theirs curtailed to “protect” them... (Unless it’s Nick)
-
-
Replying to @tomdupresh @hopenothate
Mmm not sure you’ve understood the article. Try this one:https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2018/05/03/far-right-dont-really-believe-free-speech/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeMulhall_ @hopenothate
“Whoever shouts loudest may win the debate” - does this apply to your mates in antifa? More seriously the two main flaws are viewing Twitter as a “private company” and not a natural monopoly on a public service, and the inability to actually define “hate”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomdupresh @hopenothate
And I think our report on GI was much more specific than just ‘hate’ when defining GI. There is a whole section on GIs ideas for a start.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeMulhall_ @hopenothate
And also, your criticism of GI is a conspiracy theory. You tell people what we say in public sounds unobjectionable but is a smokescreen for secret views that are. There is 0 evidence for this. We get attacked by the far right for our views regularly
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomdupresh @hopenothate
Not true. We actually say your core ideas (ethnopluralism/remigration/etc) are much more extreme in practise than you say and much more extreme than the image you portray. No conspiracy there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeMulhall_ @hopenothate
I think you deliberately misunderstand those words, ethnopluralism is about as non-controversial as you can get, and you pretend remigration is about mass repatriation when it is nothing of the sort... this country had net emigration until the early 90s
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomdupresh @hopenothate
This is the issue. You may think ethnopluralism is non-controversial yet it is and the means necessary to bring it about would be very extreme. Remigration is repatriation. Your idea of ‘self deportation’ is also extremely ugly.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeMulhall_ @hopenothate
Remigration ≠ repatriation - did we experience mass repatriations in the 1980s, during the period of net outflow? So do you support criminals who entered this country illegally, and religious fanatics who endorse terrorism remaining in this country? That is extreme, not us.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomdupresh @hopenothate
GI says it would achieve net outflow by a combination of deportation and ‘self deportation’ brought about by reducing living standards of migrants.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If closing radical Salafist / Wahhabist mosques is "reducing living standards", then sure
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.