The subtitle starts with 'epidemiologists', yet I have counted just two of them on the long list of the endorsements.
-
-
-
You might just be doing a ctrl F Look at every line. Eg I’d say an ex-Director of the WHO is equipped to have an opinion on this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey Tomas- you taking interview requests?
-
Yes! Although working on this 18h/day so really depends on what can push the message farthest. Feel free to dm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's not healthy skepticism but an ad hominem attack.
-
In areas where ppl don’t have enough expertise, they don’t know what they don’t know, and can’t trust their judgment only. In those circumstances, they look at experts to vet. Same as peer review. I think it’s fair. But agree w/ you that it’s frequently mixed w/ad hominem
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dismayed not to make list....
-
Somebody is helping me compile. We must have missed. We didn’t see your retweet. Will look into it tomorrow. Thanks for flagging!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Two great, well written and thoughtful articles. However, for the Hammer and Dance one I was wondering if the description of S and L strains was reversed. My tweet in the article’s thread not yet answered. Thanks.
-
I deleted that reference because I was sent papers showing there’s still debate on S vs L
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.