Conversation
Replying to
Probably best fits "Imperative Programming". Procedures (words) + state (global variables, global data stack).
4
Replying to
In the company of C/Pascal ?! Perhaps so ... though I feel it should somehow be a bit more than just that.
2
Replying to
. A subset of Forth can be made to look like a "linear, functional language", even if Forth is very close to ASM. Harder with C.
Replying to
The "linear" part of Forth is in explicit DUP and DROP operators. Being very vague, but C and #rustlang relate in a similar way maybe?
1
Show replies
Replying to
There's also the "concatenative functional" interpretation, which flips the linearity a bit.
2
1
Replying to
. Inside this is a concatenative functional language on top of #racketlang : zwizwa.be/staapl/staapl.
3
3