Conversation

Replying to
Yeah, at some point I'm going to realize I'm just re-inventing a lisp or forth or erlang or something. I'm trying to figure out a useful little scripting lang for embedded applications, that is relatively compact/simple. (at least smaller than a wasm or circuitpython or lua)
3
2
Replying to and
This is a holy grail to me as well. Gut feeling is that the generality needed for an Erlang-like scripting lang is too great to fit it into that kind of code/data space. Forth as a scripting lang with some decent primitives goes a long way, but good luck selling that :-)
1
Replying to and
I call this "protocol oriented programming": protocols optimized for parsing using simple stack machines. Structured data = stack machine program. Used in synthesizer that's under development but currently on hold. Lots of work still. Hope to pick this up in winter.
1
1
Replying to
Send me an email if you want to be subjected to incoherent rambling. I'm a bit stuck.. my ideas are going all over the place. Looks like I will touch the code again this week so might be a good time to weed it out and write something about it.
1
Replying to and
I think I know what I want. A stack machine model that fits into contemporary architectures, i,e, a meta system that can be used to reason about meaning of programs, while still using the compression aspect of Forth, i.e. let a human do the code factoring & instantiation.
1
1