have you been building stuff in public but without talking about it?
i want to know
Conversation
Replying to
I used this for a while, then stopped using it because it was too different from my usual work flow and most Erlang code I write these days is all integration. I scaled it back a bit to just running unit tests when I save a file, and then committing test output to git.
1
Show replies
Replying to
> redo: implementation of Redo build system in Erlang
what's been your experience with this? have you tried tup? and would be interesting in chatting about zap?
what I don't like about redo is that it feels so bashy/scripty -- I want build tools to also *feel* robust
1
Replying to
I liked the redo idea. The shell + filesystem was a serious limitation for me, so I implemented it in Erlang and generalized it to all kinds of "state with a name". That version I really like, and it is quickly turning into the backbone of exo. I've not looked into tup or zap.
1
Show replies