This is a dangerous argument. Because it tries to make a constitutional claim that the president as a person and the national interest are inseparable. The president and the state are one and the same. That's authoritarianism. 2/2
Prikaži ovu nit
Alan Dershowitz is arguing that @realDonaldTrump is allowed to coerce foreign powers into tampering in our elections in order to get himself reelection because presidents believe their own reelection is in the national interest. 1/n
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If only Justice Roberts could interject and ask, "what is the limiting principle within that argument?" Spoiler, there isn't one.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
L'etat, c'est moi
-
En fait tout est une question d'état.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I had a feeling they would end up on this defense. So much for free and fair elections. Why wouldn’t the president just abandon elections altogether as I’m sure every first term president thinks what’s best for the country is for them to be reelected.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Cut out the middle man: just cancel elections.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I believe I should be allowed to do a lot of things that are illegal. I can't wait to use this in court.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This would be true if the US was China or Russia or Cambodia
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.