This is a dangerous argument. Because it tries to make a constitutional claim that the president as a person and the national interest are inseparable. The president and the state are one and the same. That's authoritarianism. 2/2
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ask Masha. Lev threatened both his Trump atty’s —Dowd abd one other—with termination. And Trump wanted her ‘taken out’.
End of conversation
-
-
-
If only Justice Roberts could interject and ask, "what is the limiting principle within that argument?" Spoiler, there isn't one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cut out the middle man: just cancel elections.
New conversation -
-
-
There is no way that Dershowitz is not being blackmailed.
-
Someone watch the video of his presentation closely and see if he is blinking out a Morse code SOS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are Republicans aware of the fact that they won’t be in power forever? Are they ok with giving Democrats the same power that they are giving Trump? Because that’s exactly what they are doing.
-
The plan is one party rule and Dems ever being in power is not part of the plan.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.