U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
In case this isn’t obvious, iCloud’s lack of end-to-end encryption has nothing to do with trusting Apple — it means your data is susceptible to entire classes of attacks. If someone hacks Apple or blackmails an employee with access, it’s possible to get the key and get your data.
Perhaps more importantly, it means you not only have to trust current Apple, but any possible leadership at Apple in the future forever: any new CEO or board could change their minds, be it 5 years from now or 50. With E2E, it doesn’t matter if Apple’s values change in the future
I think there is also a separate safety of your employees argument for E2E encryption. Having a master password puts employees with access to it in danger of attack (especially when you consider US government officials use iPhones!). This exists in a much less potent form in E2E
Couldn’t a future board / CEO change how encryption works, even if initially E2E encrypted?
Yes but that’s a “from now on” situation. You can say “whoa, the head of the CIA is the CEO of Apple now, okidoke no more backing up”. You could also choose not to even retrieve backups anymore in that case.
I hear you, I want it too, but right now Europe, UK, Australia and the US by proxy, are actively pursuing laws to require companies to provide back door access to encrypted data. I suspect the concern is that enabling e2e now would force their hand and make things worse.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
